








I don't know, it's already in print. We'll just settle for 1 each.nECr0MaNCeD wrote:If this passes USPCC art review I'll buy a brick of Jerry's Nuggets for everyone at UC.
OK. I retract the above offer. They claim to have "discussed" the art with USPCC but I would still expect flying bovines before USPCC printed these.
Cbkimble wrote:I don't know, it's already in print. We'll just settle for 1 each.nECr0MaNCeD wrote:If this passes USPCC art review I'll buy a brick of Jerry's Nuggets for everyone at UC.
OK. I retract the above offer. They claim to have "discussed" the art with USPCC but I would still expect flying bovines before USPCC printed these.
I was referring to the Jerry's nuggets part.nECr0MaNCeD wrote:Cbkimble wrote:I don't know, it's already in print. We'll just settle for 1 each.nECr0MaNCeD wrote:If this passes USPCC art review I'll buy a brick of Jerry's Nuggets for everyone at UC.
OK. I retract the above offer. They claim to have "discussed" the art with USPCC but I would still expect flying bovines before USPCC printed these.
I didn't see that anywhere on the project page, just that they've discussed it with USPCC. Robert Tomlinson discussed and sent art to USPCC for Global Unrest only to have it unapproved late in his campaign. Looking at this deck and knowing how retentive USPCC can be I still have serious doubts they will print it. Heck, didn't UUSI barely get approval for Hotcakes? And that was very tasteful art compared to the "Pin up" style of this deck.
Cbkimble wrote:I was referring to the Jerry's nuggets part.
Cbkimble wrote:Ummm...I...uhhh...but...it's...oh never mind.
Ok the conflict is this: you're obviously designing a deck with very specific demographics. But you're only making the women erotic and the men all awkward. I'd suggest either making all the courts women or homogenizing the eroticism on all the courts with seductive women AND men. Your designing a sexy deck so the old wizard has no place there.Mike wrote:We here to improve our project, so write me please what words will be look better on cards.... or maybe delete them at all... about gandalf)) - this is not gandalf - why girls are naked and man -not? because girls are sexy .... so i`ll like to hear constructive advice fro you..
Ok - you want to see nacked Gandalf?)))))Eoghann wrote:Ok the conflict is this: you're obviously designing a deck with very specific demographics. But you're only making the women erotic and the men all awkward. I'd suggest either making all the courts women or homogenizing the eroticism on all the courts with seductive women AND men. Your designing a sexy deck so the old wizard has no place there.Mike wrote:We here to improve our project, so write me please what words will be look better on cards.... or maybe delete them at all... about gandalf)) - this is not gandalf - why girls are naked and man -not? because girls are sexy .... so i`ll like to hear constructive advice fro you..
For everything that is holy just get rid of the quotes all together. That's about as sexy as lathering someone up in chocolate syrup and licking them clean...it's not sexy.
god please don't use that. It's been overdone.Mike wrote:What do you think if I use words from the poster Keep Calm and Carry On for my cards. For e.x. Keep calm and be my Valentine
Ok - what about text - remove it at all?volantangel wrote:Ok honestly your art is good, however this definitely should not be marketed as a valentines day deck, perhaps go for a modern pin-up girl deck, lose the text and just perhaps you will be in the game again.
Users browsing this forum: acetofive, brownsl, Google [Bot], Timmargh and 8 guests